Answers are paraphrased for easy reading

[Is it authorized to declare oneself 'Ritvik'] People from the other side often ask: "Even if you say that the ritvik system was established by Srila Prabhupada, he specifically named eleven individuals. None of you are among those eleven. So how are you continuing this system? Isn't it unauthorized? Have you simply declared yourselves to be ritviks because you want the prestige and glory associated with that position instead of giving it to the gurus?" How should this be answered?

Topic: Other camp | Speaker: MPP | Shloka: SB 4.15.24 | Dated: 17 Dec 2024 | Time Stamp: 33:07
Answer
A ritvik can never be self-declared. A ritvik must be appointed.

First of all, this is an institutional arrangement. Gurus may exist anywhere, but the ritvik system is an arrangement established within the institutional framework of ISKCON. Therefore, a representative functioning in that system cannot simply decide on his own, "I want to become a ritvik."

Such representatives must be authorized by a governing body.

In the relevant conversations, Srila Prabhupada mentioned the eleven names and also indicated that additional appointments could be made by the GBC. Therefore, Prabhupada himself acknowledged that the GBC could appoint representatives.

In our case, we hold that the original GBC deviated on a fundamental issue, and therefore we did not continue to subordinate ourselves to that authority. Even during Srila Prabhupada's presence, when major mistakes were made, he suspended the authority of the GBC. This demonstrates that GBC authority is not absolute and can be withdrawn when serious deviations occur.

The major mistake that occurred after 1977 was the assumption that certain individuals had become full initiating gurus in the traditional sense. Even many within ISKCON later acknowledged problems with that understanding and subsequently modified their position.

Therefore, within our system, a governing body has been formed through the collective participation and approval of devotees and temple leaders. That governing body determines who may serve as ritviks.

The important point is that the system remains institutional and authorized, not self-appointed.

Some people ask, "Where is the historical tradition for this ritvik system?" The response is that this system is not presented as a traditional parampara arrangement. Rather, the understanding is that Srila Prabhupada remains the current initiating link, and his teachings, books, and instructions continue to guide devotees.

Even if, for argument's sake, one were to question both systems, one must ask: Which is the greater error?

A ritvik does not claim to be a guru accepting disciples eternally. He does not claim to absorb karma, guarantee liberation, or establish a permanent spiritual bond with disciples. He merely performs an officiating function on behalf of Srila Prabhupada.

In a large institution, someone must perform that function.
Watch Video