Answers are paraphrased for easy reading

[Worshiping Krishna in different moods] Krishna is absolute truth and SP and SP says that absolute truth means past, present and future are one and the same. So when we chant Hare Krishna then Krishna is present because Krishna is there. So my question in this context is Leela, Rupa, Nama and Guna they're all one and the same say when we are reading one and the same in which way? See if they're one and the same then why they called different? My question is about when we are reading Krishna leelas, all other rasas are very easy to relate to with Krishna but when coming to deity worship like Sri Radha Krishna Chandra, I don't feel Radha Krishna Chandra as my son, maybe shanta or dasya rasa. And many times we don't even relate with nama prabhu or gunas. Also many times we like Krishna but liking Krishna is different from having relationship with Krishna.

Category: Devotional Service | Speaker: MPP | Date: 2025-09-02 | Time Stamp: 57:00 | Shloka: SB 4.18.11-13
Answer
If everything is one, then why are they called differently?

They are one in principle (tattva), but different in expression (variety). There is only one Absolute Truth—Krishna—but He manifests in unlimited varieties.

For example:

Krishna’s name (nāma) is one form of Krishna

His form (rūpa) is another

His qualities (guṇa) are another

His pastimes (līlā) are another

All of them are Krishna Himself, but expressed in different ways for different kinds of relationships and reciprocation.

Unlike material variety, where things are separate, Krishna’s varieties are non-different from Him—they are His own expansions. Just as the holy name is Krishna Himself in sound form (nāma-prabhu), He chooses to reciprocate through that form.

Different devotees become attached to different aspects:

Some are drawn to rūpa (form)

Some to līlā (pastimes)

Some to nāma (holy name), appreciating especially its mercy

For example, a person may not yet have the qualification to fully appreciate Krishna’s form or pastimes, but through chanting, they can develop a deep relationship with the nāma-avatāra.

Similarly, the archa-vigraha (deity form) is also Krishna. Everything—nāma, rūpa, guṇa, līlā—is Krishna. One person, unlimited expressions.

A simple analogy: one person can have many roles—mother, daughter, wife, sister—yet remains the same individual. Similarly, Krishna manifests in different ways for the sake of loving exchanges (rasa), which are unlimited.

Now, regarding your question about relationships:

It is natural that while reading Krishna’s pastimes, different rasas (like vātsalya, sakhya, etc.) may feel relatable. But when it comes to deity worship or chanting, one may not feel such a clear or specific relationship. Sometimes there is only a general appreciation, not a deep personal connection.

This is because relationship with Krishna cannot be rushed. It requires purification.

Krishna has made Himself especially accessible in the form of the holy name. The holy name acts even without qualification—it purifies, transforms, and gradually awakens realization.

In contrast:

When you imagine Krishna’s form in the mind, it depends on the purity of the mind

When you read līlā, without purification, you may interpret it materially

But when you chant, Krishna directly touches you through sound, regardless of your level. This is the special mercy of the holy name.

That is why it is often advised:
“Simply hear and chant.”
Because through nāma, you are directly associating with Krishna.

As purification happens:

The mind becomes clear

One gains spiritual eligibility (adhikāra)

Then Krishna reveals Himself more deeply in rūpa, guṇa, and līlā

At an advanced stage, for a pure devotee, all are experienced as one—nāma, rūpa, guṇa, and līlā are fully non-different. But for us, the easiest and most powerful entry point is nāma (the holy name).

So although all aspects are one in tattva,
the practical way to experience that oneness is to begin with sincere chanting of the holy name.